APQP vs PPAP — What’s the Actual Difference?

 APQP vs PPAP — What’s the Actual Difference?

In the automotive and manufacturing world, two processes define how well a supplier can deliver a reliable, consistent, and defect-free product: APQP and PPAP. These terms appear in audits, customer requirements, supplier agreements, and new project launches — yet many professionals still misunderstand the difference between the two.

Some treat them as paperwork.
Some use them only when customers ask.
Some think PPAP is APQP.

But the truth is much clearer:

👉 APQP is the journey.
👉 PPAP is the proof.

One without the other leads to mistakes, rejections, and customer escalation. Together, they create a structured, disciplined process that ensures both product and process readiness.

This article breaks down APQP and PPAP in simple, practical language — without jargon — so any engineer or manufacturing professional can understand and apply them correctly.



1️. What Is APQP (Advanced Product Quality Planning)?

APQP is a structured method to develop a product and its manufacturing process.
It begins at the very start of a project and continues until the product is released into full production.

The primary purpose of APQP is simple:

Identify risks early
Build controls to prevent defects
Ensure process capability
Confirm that the product meets all requirements
Align cross-functional teams

APQP follows 5 main phases, which create a complete roadmap for project development.


Phase 1: Plan & Define Program

This stage focuses on understanding what the customer needs — not just what they asked for in the drawing.

Key activities include:

  • Voice of Customer (VOC)
  • Feasibility review
  • Customer standards collection
  • Prelim design study
  • Risk assessment

This stage ensures everyone understands what must be delivered.


Phase 2: Product Design & Development

Here, engineering teams confirm whether the product design is robust.

Activities include:

  • DFMEA (Design FMEA)
  • Design verification & validation
  • Prototype builds
  • DVP&R (Test plan)
  • Special characteristic identification

Even if you don't control the design (as a buy-off supplier), this phase ensures you understand risks related to the component.


Phase 3: Process Design & Development

This is where manufacturing preparation happens.

Key outputs:

  • Process Flow Diagram
  • PFMEA
  • Control Plan
  • Workstation layout
  • Tooling, fixtures, and gauge planning
  • Equipment selection and validation
  • Operator training plan

This phase defines how the part will be produced with consistent quality.


Phase 4: Product & Process Validation

This is the real proof that the process works.

Activities include:

  • Trial production run
  • Process capability studies (Cp/Cpk)
  • MSA (Gage repeatability/reproducibility)
  • Initial process studies
  • Dimensional reports
  • Material and performance tests
  • Validation of special characteristics

Everything produced here becomes part of the PPAP submission.


Phase 5: Feedback, Corrective Action & Improvement

After production start, the team ensures:

  • Process monitoring
  • Reaction plans
  • Defect prevention
  • Lessons learned capture

APQP does not end with launch — it continues to ensure ongoing process stability.




2️. What Is PPAP (Production Part Approval Process)?

PPAP is the final customer approval package that confirms:

The product meets all specification requirements
The process is capable and stable
The controls defined during APQP are implemented
The supplier can produce quality parts consistently

PPAP contains 18 elements, such as:

  • Design records
  • Process Flow Diagram
  • PFMEA
  • Control Plan
  • MSA results
  • Capability studies
  • Appearance approval
  • Functional checks
  • Sample parts
  • PSW (Part Submission Warrant)

While APQP is about planning and developing the process,
PPAP is the submission proving that the planning worked.

Once a PPAP is approved, the customer officially authorizes the supplier to begin mass production.


3️. Key Differences Between APQP and PPAP

Although both APQP and PPAP belong to the AIAG Core Tools family, their purpose is completely different.

Aspect

APQP

PPAP

Purpose

Develop & validate process

Confirm readiness & get approval

Focus

Prevention & planning

Documentation & evidence

Timing

Throughout development

At the end before SOP

Output

Process readiness

Customer approval

Approach

Proactive

Proof-based

Responsibility

Cross-functional team

Supplier + Quality team

Frequency

Continuous

One-time per change



Summary:
➡️ APQP = Building readiness
➡️ PPAP = Demonstrating readiness




4️. Why Both Are ImportantMany companies fail PPAP because APQP was not followed properly.

If APQP is weak, PPAP will expose it.

Typical symptoms include:

  • Poor process capability
  • High scrap during trial production
  • Missing MSA studies
  • Control plan not matching PFMEA
  • Incorrect flow diagram
  • Wrong material certificates
  • Last-minute firefighting

Customers expect suppliers to use APQP as preventive planning, not documentation work.

Strong APQP → Smooth PPAP → Strong customer trust.



5️. Common Mistakes Companies Make

🔸 APQP Mistakes

  • Treating APQP as paperwork instead of process design
  • PFMEA copied from old projects with no updates
  • SOPs not matching control plan
  • No cross-functional team involvement
  • Gage planning done too late
  • Not considering actual production constraints
  • Missing operator training during development

🔸 PPAP Mistakes

  • Submitting documents that don’t match shopfloor reality
  • Capability studies done on small batches
  • MSA done incompletely
  • Wrong or outdated control plan
  • Samples not traceable
  • Incomplete or blank fields in PSW
  • Customer-specific requirements ignored

These mistakes lead to rejection, delays, and escalation.




6️. Best Practices to Ensure Successful APQP & PPAP

Here are practical steps used by top-performing suppliers:

Start APQP early — don’t wait for final drawings

Even preliminary information helps.

Build a strong link: Flow → PFMEA → Control Plan → Work Instructions

These four must always match.

Treat PFMEA as a living document

Update it whenever:

  • Issues occur
  • Process changes
  • Customer complaints
  • Engineering revisions

Validate the process under real production conditions

Not lab conditions.

Ensure MSA and capability studies are authentic

Not “arranged” for PPAP purposes.

PPAP must reflect the actual shopfloor

Not a temporary condition for auditors.

Capture lessons learned

Most defects repeat because lessons are not carried forward.




7️. Final Conclusion

APQP and PPAP are not forms, checklists, or mandatory requirements.
They are powerful frameworks that ensure manufacturing success.

👉 APQP helps teams plan better.
👉 PPAP gives customers confidence.

When both are implemented correctly, suppliers achieve:

Zero-defect culture
Better customer confidence
Reduced rework & scrap
Fewer escalations
Faster approvals
Strong, stable processes

APQP builds the foundation.
PPAP confirms the result.
Together, they create a robust and reliable manufacturing system that delivers quality the first time — every time.

#APQP #PPAP #QualityEngineering #AutomotiveIndustry
#ManufacturingExcellence #CoreTools #IATF16949
#ProcessValidation #NewProductDevelopment #QualityManagement
#SupplierQuality #ZeroDefect #EngineeringLeadership

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Statistical Process Control (SPC)

ISO 9001:2015 – Clause 8: Operation

Internal audit & why it is importance in ISO 9001